Y O U R L I F E ' S W O R K |
|
|
Insights on maintaining
balance |
|
|
February 2006 For a printable PDF version of this newsletter, click here Learn more about us at: then use the subscribe form at the bottom of the page. Feel Free to Share! Previous articles are archived on our Phone: (650) 598-9935 |
Survival of the Fittest in an Era of Change “It is not necessary to change; survival is not
mandatory.” W. Edwards Deming Managing
change is one of the greatest challenges healthcare leaders face today. They
must be able to anticipate the need for change, prepare a plan for future
success, and then achieve results toward that vision through the people in
their organizations. Whether you are a CEO, physician executive or nurse
manager, your ability to successfully lead and manage change can have a huge
positive effect on your organization and your career. The quote from W. Edwards Deming above should be a
sobering reminder for us. In this time of increasing competition and
regulation, and growing public expectations about the level of care that
hospitals, health systems and clinicians should provide, we need to change
how we operate so we can survive. A hospital that has served a community for
a hundred years will be lucky to survive for another five years if it’s
not keeping up with the best clinical practices and top-percentile patient
satisfaction numbers of the new hospital across town. These things require
innovation, and that means change. Resistance—The First HurdleFear and resistance must be overcome in managing change. In instituting the magnitude of changes that are necessary in healthcare today, fear and resistance will inevitably be encountered, no matter how noble the intentions of the change or how much we as leaders try to sugarcoat it. As Robert F. Kennedy once said: “Progress is a nice word, but change is its motivator, and change has its enemies.” So how do you ensure as a leader that positive changes
occur and, most importantly, are sustained over the long term? It starts
with knowing and acknowledging that change is needed, and communicating what
the changes will be. Leaders should recognize that all people have different
reactions to transitions—from those who dive into new opportunities with
reckless abandon, to those who meet any uncertainty with anxiety. Leaders
also need to accept that these people will all be on the same team. Leadership development and communication consultant Randell Jones says that there are three types of change styles: Conservers, Pragmatists and Originators, and they all go through cycles of change differently. It’s not as important to know the specifics of these change styles as it is to recognize that the effective change leader will be the one who can ease the tensions among people who handle change differently. According to noted change-management consultant Rick Maurer, there are three basic reasons people resist change:
In dealing with the first two—a lack of understanding
and fear of the change—leaders can go a long way toward curbing this
resistance by aggressively and effectively communicating the change and how
it will be accomplished. The last one is a little tougher. People are usually mistrustful of change because of a history
of failed change initiatives in your organization or in others in which they
have previously worked. With these people, you may have to find out why they
believe previous efforts failed and get their input as to how they believe
you can avoid those failures in the future.
So in all three cases, effective communication can be the key to
success. Jones says that at the beginning point of the change process, leaders often struggle over how much information they should give out. The need to withhold some information at the beginning could be considered a valid argument, because this is usually the point where people have the most fear. However, Jones says that laying it all out on the table at the beginning is important because doing so brings more of a sense of reality to the change. I would add that the last thing people need when they are resisting change is an unexpected or unpleasant surprise in the middle of the process. Start out on a Positive Note I would also recommend this at the beginning of a major change—start with the positives. Let’s say your goal is to decrease wait times and improve throughput in the emergency department. By doing this you can greatly improve the bottom line and patient satisfaction at the same time. This is a huge undertaking that requires everyone involved to move far out of their comfort zones for the sake of long-term improvement. After announcing this change, a good place to start might be to meet with everyone and say: “What is working with our processes here in the ED? What are some of the good things that we’re doing right now to get patients to a doctor quickly, get their tests done and back right away, and get them admitted for the care they need or on their way back home with a prescription?” Give them some time. Maybe give them a few days or a week to go back and talk about it among themselves and then come back with a list. Using this method, everything starts on a positive note
and moves forward the same way from there. Once this information is fed in
on the front end, then you can start talking about how things can be done
even better, and you can talk more naturally and comfortably about what is
not working so well. Resistance can be a Good Thing
In environments of change, leaders sometimes make the mistake of trying to rid the environment of any resistance. Those who show initial resistance are often excluded from teams or given lesser responsibilities. Don’t be so quick to dismiss resistance. You don’t necessarily want your whole team of people blindly jumping off a cliff into the ocean with you. You might want a few of them standing on top of the cliff yelling “shark!” if there happen to be a couple of them in the water at the time. Those who resist often do so because they are aware of some of the pitfalls of past efforts, and they know how to warn you where the sharks are. It can be very valuable to get their input into the change process, learn what they know about past failures and why they happened, and use that information to more effectively manage the change process. It can be a great way to involve them and make them feel more ownership for the effort, thereby easing their resistance. That being said, they still need to move past resisting the change, or eventually they will erode the entire effort, and that may mean you will have to remove them from the team at some point. Lead, but get Help to Manage It’s important to realize that you as the leader are leading the change, but that managing the change is a huge undertaking that no single leader can accomplish. If you try to do it all yourself, you will fail. You need to complement your strengths with the abilities of others. For example, you may not be the greatest facilitator (I’d advise you to work on that), so you find someone in your organization who is a great facilitator and put that person on the team to help manage collaborative efforts in the change. The same goes for communication, which is key to the change process. You also need a great communicator to help manage the constant informational aspects of managing change, even if communication is one of your great strengths. Finally, as the leader, you need to embody the change. If you decree that everyone will be communicating information via the intranet, then that’s how you must be communicating. If one of the requirements is that everyone at the end of each day write a one-sentence report about at least one thing they did to get us one step closer to the goal, your report should be the one they see first, and they need to see it every day. As Mahatma Ghandi once said, “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” More about this in the next newsletter. Betty Till Tips For Managing Change
|